Rural FFA Leadership: Understanding Members’ Role and the Context of Chapter Activities
Robin Peiter Horstmeier
Assistant Professor of Agricultural Education Martha A. Nall
Professor of Extension 712 Garrigus Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40546 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
This study sought to understand FFA leadership activities and member role in planning these activities. Qualitative research methods were used to gain insight into the perceptions of FFA members. Twelve chapters from 11 different states participated in four focus group sessions at the National FFA Convention. Youth participating in the focus group interviews provided less emphasis on youth as objects and more discussion of youth as resources and partners. More frequently youth described their roles as resources or partners. Participants could easily identify personal benefits from participation in FFA activities. As the dialogue moved to community it was more difficult for FFA members to describe benefits. Students easily described the activities which helped them develop leadership skills in the context of understanding self. The most difficult area was related to community.
Although the purposes of youth organizations vary and the context is different, they generally seek to provide events and experiences which help adolescents become contributing adults and leaders. A report for the US Department of Health and Human Services, Understanding Youth Development: Promoting Positive Pathways of Growth (1997), indicated that when adolescents feel competent, connected, have a sense of control and a sense of identity they are more likely to exhibit positive developmental behaviors. Interactions identified as most productive in producing these outcomes include those that:
- provide recognition for their productivity,
- involve interactions with adults who monitor and supervise behaviors and activities,
- consistently involve caring adults who provide emotional support, encouragement, and practical advice, and
- create exchanges between adolescents and adults based on the acceptance of adolescents as individuals.
The National FFA Organization (formally known as the Future Farmers of America) seeks to create opportunities for adolescents to engage in a variety of experiences, events and activities to develop leadership skills and provide interactions which lead to positive youth development. The LifeKnowledge curriculum has been designed to guide the activities and development of leadership skills. The advisor influences members and impacts the outcomes related to growth and development of the members. Although many leadership studies examining FFA have been studied, very little research has been conducted examining the youth-adult interactions and the context in which leadership behaviors are learned through FFA or other youth leadership organizations.
Role of Youth in Society
Lofquist (1989) developed a “spectrum of attitudes” that adults may hold regarding the role of young people in society. The continuum (see Figure 1) represents attitudes where young people are viewed as “objects” (do this because I know best), as “recipients” (do this because it is good for you), and as “resources” (do this because you can make a contribution). The Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development (2001) added a characterization of youth as “partners” (youth share leadership and decision-making roles with adults) to Lofquist’s (1989) original continuum.
Spectrum of adult attitudes toward youth
Youth as Objects Youth as Recipients Youth as Resources Youth as Partners
The view adults take toward young people tends to shape the nature of the leadership programs. In some programs, the leader is “in charge” and followers are objects to be directed. At other times, youth run activities designed by adults with intentions of knowledge and skills for later life (Lofquist, 1989). Programs where young people are resources, promote growth in knowledge, skills and self- esteem. Sometimes youth are engaged as full partners with adults in making decisions and taking actions (Peiter, Nall, & Rennekamp, 2005).
Context of Leadership Activity
Ayres (1987) identified four key developmental phases through which individuals engaged in a leadership curriculum should progress (see Figure 2). First, individuals develop knowledge of themselves, who they are, what they believe, and how they function. Progressively they move to mastering skills for working with others, refining skills working with groups or organizations and finally focusing on leadership within the context of communities, systems, and society. As the arena in which leadership is being practiced continues, individuals use knowledge and skills learned at previous levels to be effective in the new context.
Context of leadership activity
Self Interpersonal Groups and Organizations Community and Society
Similarly, Austin (1996) offered a leadership model which focused on developing knowledge and skills first at the individual level, emphasizing that “before we can contribute to a larger effort, it is imperative that we understand ourselves” (p.
118). This model combined interpersonal interactions and the ability to participate in and understand group development. The third level in this model focuses on community, recognizing that the ultimate goal of individual and group development is to serve the common good beyond the individual or organization.
Leadership Development in Agricultural Education
As a premier agriculture youth leadership organization, FFA has prepared future leaders through local, state and national activities. The FFA mission states “The National FFA Organization is dedicated to making a positive difference in the lives of young people by developing their potential for premier leadership,
personal growth and career success through agricultural education” (National FFA, 2005).
Research studies indicated participation in FFA enhances leadership abilities. Researchers (Townsend & Carter, 1983; Wingenbach & Kahler, 1997) have found a positive relationship between leadership skill development and FFA participation. Further, Brannon, Holley, & Key (1989) found Vocational Agriculture and the FFA had an impact on the success of many community leaders. These community leaders who had participated in vocational agriculture felt their leadership activities were effective in developing their leadership skills, contributed to their success, and have been of value to their careers regardless of their occupations. Scales and Leffert (1999) concluded that youth organizations provide opportunities for success, a sense of belonging and safety, activities that are challenging, interaction and support from adults, leadership opportunities, and other interactions that contribute to the positive development and resiliency of youth.
Peiter, Nall, and Rennekamp (2005) examined the role of youth and in the context of FFA leadership activities. When examining the role of youth through leadership activities, respondents indicated the strongest agreement in being treated as partners. However, their partnership focused on developing self. As we looked at developing leadership knowledge and skills moving from self to interpersonal development (others) to group development and ultimately to community/society development, the means decreased at each level. This indicates less opportunity for involvement in leadership activities focusing on developing skills at a higher level.
Purpose and Research Objectives
This study is designed to describe the leadership activities of rural FFA members, the role of youth-adult interactions in those activities, and the context of the activity as it develops leadership skills. The objectives of this study include:
- Describe the context in which FFA leadership activities in rural communities are performed.
- Describe FFA members’ role in planning leadership activities.
Qualitative research methods were used to gain insight into the perceptions of FFA members, as recommended by Peiter, Nall, and Rennekamp (2005).
Perceptions examined included leadership skills developed through chapter activities and the role of members in those activities. The focus group method was
used for framing the study. Focus groups were conducted according to established protocols (Kreuger & Casey, 2000; Rennekamp & Nall, 2003).
- Small groups of six to 12 members.
- Possessing similarities in one or more ways.
- Guided through a facilitated discussion.
- Topic clearly defined.
- Purpose to gather opinions from the group.
As part of research project funded by USDA and National FFA Organization, the population was rural FFA members. As a follow-up to the original study, participants were solicited from the respondents of the 2004 study conducted by Peiter, et al. (2005). Of the 36 chapters, 12 chapters agreed with 11 different states representing all four National FFA regions. Prior to the National FFA Convention, chapters were sent a letter indicating details of the focus group procedure. Four sessions with three chapters per session were assigned a scheduled time to arrive at the convention site, each scheduled for one hour.
However, five chapters with a total of 16 students participated in the focus group interviews conducted in October 2005.
To assure accuracy of data, a tape recorder was placed in the center of the table and two assistants were seated at opposite corners to take notes. An awareness of personal biases were acknowledged and checked with peer reviewers. The researchers acknowledges that their experience in leadership and agricultural education domain help to conceptualize the study, including interview selection questions and interpretation of the data.
The welcome and all questions used were scripted to ensure consistency between focus group sessions. Questions for each focus group began with students identifying their name, school and leadership roles in FFA and when they first joined FFA. Students reflected on their experiences and how their involvement has changed over the years. They also identified the influence of other members and advisor(s) in their experiences and activities in which they chose to participate.
Context of FFA member’s leadership activities were also investigated through focus group interviews. Questions were structured to ask for activities within the context of developing themselves as a leader, skills in working with others, working with groups, and working in their community. Each context of leadership activity (self, others, groups, and community) had a series of questions with the purpose of encouraging dialogue and identify the role of the youth-adult interaction.
Focus group participants included FFA member youth in their second to six year of membership. Similarly, involvement ranged from very little, never holding an office, to those who had held multiple offices and were very involved.
When asked who helped them get involved in the organization the responses generally indicated a familiarity with someone else in FFA. Respondents identified older students, a relative, i.e., brother, sister, cousin, or other “kids encouraged me to join.” Older members and siblings played a strong role in getting new members involved. One student said, “I saw older members doing things and having fun.” For one student it was a project that FFA conducted she wanted to be a part of. Several responded that the advisor was a key. One in particular responded that “the advisor said it would be useful to me.” Parents who had been members of FFA also influenced some participants to join this organization. One participant indicated participation because “I want to be a Soil Conservation Agent and figure it will help.” Another female participant responded, “There are not many girls in FFA and I thought it would be fun.”
Context of Leadership Activities
Participants in the focus groups were asked to describe activities which helped development themselves as a leader. As a follow-up question they were asked to identify the leadership skills they developed through participating in these activities.
Self. Students described activities such as attending leadership conferences, meeting with other FFA chapters, serving as an officer, speaking to classes of younger students to inform them about FFA, participating in contests, and conducting service projects such as preparing food baskets at holidays. Skills students developed from these activities included goal setting, communication skills and public speaking. They also identified developing self confidence, learning to think on your feet, getting out of your comfort zone, and feeling important as outcomes of participation in activities in FFA. One participant stated, “FFA makes you feel important and a part of something good.”
Others. FFA activities also helped students developed interpersonal skills. Many of these activities involved fund raising experiences. Fruit sales, selling tickets, labor auctions, and plant sales were mentioned. Other activities where FFA members developed interpersonal skills included weekly officer meetings, being a mentor, membership recruitment events, and being a role model.
By participating in these activities the students in the focus groups were able to describe what they had learned from these experiences. Being able to “talk to people” and feeling comfortable around people were two benefits identified.
Other students identified learning “people skills” and dealing with interpersonal conflicts as a result of participating in FFA. Being a mentor and role model helps students recognize the influence they can have on others. One participant stated “Young students are always looking up to you to see what you are doing as a leader. You have to always watch what you say and do.” Committees of officers and members develop skills in communicating and listening. Students said they had learned to share ideas and respond to comments from others. Chapter activities seemed to have benefits beyond the goal of raising money or completing a project. “Being forced to socialize with others makes you more outgoing,” said one participant.
Groups. FFA activities also helped members develop skills for working in groups. Students described chapter activities, nominating committees and projects which required multiple committees, organization, planning and working as a team to accomplish goals. In raising money to help hurricane victims, students from one chapter described with enthusiasm the “total student project.” From involving other student organizations, to getting permission from administrators and conducting the activity, the students worked together and developed leadership skills for effective groups. Participants from another chapter described a “Food for America Day,” an activity conducted to help third grade students gain an appreciation for agriculture. This all-day event involved multiple activities, food, live animals, hay rides and preparation visits to all third grade classes attending from five towns. Students proudly described assuming the responsibility for all arrangements, successfully handling unexpected situations and working together to solve problems. Learning to work with others, planning for the unexpected, building trust, following through with commitments and communication were group skills developed from this activity.
Officer retreats with team building sessions helped students learn to work in groups. Participants said they learned to “work as a team not as individuals.” One participant said through working as a team she “learned that you don’t have to talk to be a leader. Talking is not the only way to communicate.” Another outcome of the team building activities was that individuals sometimes sacrifice personal gain for the good of the group.
Community. Participants described FFA activities which helped them develop skills to work in a community. Many of the activities were community service
projects. Adopt-a highway projects, landscaping schools and public buildings, helping with a golf tournament, collecting trees to mulch and protecting the land fill, decorating a public building for the holidays, and preparing food baskets at Thanksgiving are examples of community projects students in the focus groups identified. Projects were often repeated from one year to the next. However, some of the students described projects where they identified a need and planned and organized the chapter to complete the activity. One student described a project to clean up the charred wood from a local farmer’s chicken house that had burned. A past chapter president helped provide a truck to haul the debris and the members did the work.
The participants described much of their involvement with adults in the community via civic or community organizations. Several students indicated they were involved with local adult organizations such as Kiwanis, Rotary, or Farm Bureau. They were speakers at their meetings, invited them to serve as judges for contests or received financial support for chapter activities.
Several acknowledged the desire to be more involved with the community and vice versa. Engaging in broader community service activities and familiarizing the community with agriculture was shared as a goal by several focus group participants.
Role of Adults
The role of the advisor was a key to participating in activities after they joined. Several mentioned that the advisor let them know about activities and how they could participate. Encouragement from advisors to apply for offices was important to students. One participant said, the “advisor opened doors to students and let students go to different events.” Another member said the advisor “corrects mistakes but lets you know it’s alright”. Other responses to the role of the advisor included, “pretty awesome,” “picks our brains and makes us think,” “makes the experience fun,” and “advisor is really good at pushing students to participate.”
Because of their relationships with older students and their involvement in the chapter, students indicated they would be supportive of younger members. When asked if the way they were treated would influence how they treated new members there was a unanimous yes.
In the focus group sessions, FFA members were asked to describe their involvement with advisors or other adults. Responses provided insight into the
relationships between the adults and youth. The role of involvement ranged from youth as objects to youth as partners. This would be expected as the participants ranged in age from freshmen to seniors, their experience in FFA ranged from second year to sixth, and their leadership knowledge and skills also varied greatly.
Youth as objects. In some instances students indicated they participated because, “it was expected,” “it would be useful,” or as one participant put it, the “advisor makes them go.” The “advisors pushed students to get involved,” also described an activity where students acknowledged the adult’s role was very directive. The students seemed to see this as a positive, in that, without this form of encouragement they might not have participated. Initially many youth need direction and guidance to get involved and as they grow and mature the roles change.
Youth as recipients. Encouraging students to participate was a frequent comment from the FFA members. Advisors “encouraged” students to run for office and “encouraged” students to be active and get involved. Programs and activities were in place and students would benefit from involvement. One participant said the “advisors opened doors to students,” indicating that they facilitated the students involvement. For an officer workshop the student said the advisor planned the event and told them what they would be learning. According to the student, “attendance was optional but all wanted to attend.”
Youth as resources. Several comments from the students indicated they felt their ideas were valued and they indicated numerous opportunities to conduct activities and be involved. “Advisors are there but students run things,” “students find judges,” or “advisor gives ideas, gets the ball rolling, and officers choose activities and implement plans,” were all phrases indicating the students were being seen as valuable resources in conducting FFA activities and events. In several situations students described the presence of an adult, the advisor, but emphasized they were the ones who made decisions and conducted activities.
Youth as partners. Not always seen in youth organizations, FFA members described situations where they felt they were true partners with the adults, even using that word. One chapter implement a field day was “organized by students and advisors – a partnership between the two.” More frequently students described the relationship in terms of working together or sharing decision- making. In interviewing officer candidates the, “president and advisor ask questions.” Another student described their nominating committee as a panel of “a graduating seniors, retiring officers, teacher and principal or parent.”
Conclusions, Recommendations, and Implications
The qualitative analysis of focus group interviews provided a forum for information gathering related the role and context of leadership activities among FFA members. The opportunity to clarify, question and probe for a clearer and more definitive description of the chapter activities and role of the adult-youth interactions substantiated the findings of Peiter, et al. (2005). Admittedly, the limited number of participants and the inexperience of some, as well as, the varying degree of strength of the FFA chapters they represented influenced the dialogue.
FFA members participating in the focus group interviews provided less emphasis on youth as objects and more discussion of youth as resources and partners. More frequently youth described their roles as resources or partners. FFA members believe with their participation as recipients, they were programs were established and participation would prepare them for the future. This is consistent with the literature based on Lofquist’s (1989) ideal spectrum of attitudes.
Responses from the focus group interviews support the findings by Peiter, et al. (2005). Parallels existed when examining the roles of youth in leadership which indicated FFA members describe their role in leadership activities as Objects (M2005 = 2.87), Recipients (M2005 = 2.88), Resources (M2005 = 2.97), and Partners (M2005 = 2.99). Participants could easily identify the personal benefits from participation in FFA activities.
In the context of leadership activities, as the dialogue moved to community it was more difficult for FFA members to describe benefits. Examples were given for each area; however students easily described the activities which helped them develop leadership skills in the context of understanding self. The most difficult area was to identify skills related community. However, numerous activities focusing on community were identified; contradicting the quantitative data.
These qualitative responses did not reinforce the findings by Peiter, et al. (2005). The original study with quantitative data reported means for Self (M2005 = 3.01), Others (M2005 = 2.92), Groups (M2005 = 2.90), and Community (M2005 = 2.88), with Community as the lowest. Student responses through the focus group interviews provided examples indicating leadership activities in each area. However, the responses of these participants were consistent and reinforced the ideal of Ayers (1987).
In describing the intersection of the role of youth and the context of leadership activities, the focus groups supported the survey findings of Peiter, et al. (2005). The context of leadership activities was the largest throughout the leadership context of developing self and within their role with adults as partners, resources and recipients.
The researchers recommend replication of study, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Future focus groups interviews stratified by age, years in FFA, and leadership responsibilities would provide additional insight into the developmental process and the growth as a result of FFA participation.
In addition, focus group interviews should be conducted with FFA advisors to gain the adult perspective of the role of FFA members and the context of activities. Comparisons of advisor and member perspectives could provide rich data for chapter member role and context of leadership activities.
Results from this study can assist leaders of the National FFA Organization to further explore current leadership roles and leadership activities. This has implications for not only members and advisors of the National FFA Organization, but beyond. School based career and technical education student leadership organizations such as DECA, FBLA, and FCCLA, as well as community based leadership youth organizations like 4-H, Boy Scouts, and Girl Scouts, should examine what their members’ role and the leadership activities offered in their organizations.
Ayres, J. (1987). The leadership development continuum. Department of Agricultural Economics, West Lafayette, IN, Journal Paper 11, 813.
Bell, J. (1996). A key to developing positive youth-adult relationships. Humanics. Spring.
Brannon, T., Holley, C. W., & Key. J. P. (1989). Impact of vocational agriculture/FFA on community leadership. Journal of Agricultural Education, 37- 44.
Calvert, M., Zeldin, S., & Weisenbach, A. (2002). Youth involvement for community, organizational, and youth development: Directions for research, evaluation, and practice. Takoma Park, MD: Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development.
Carter, R. I., & Spotanski, D. R. (1989). Perceptions of leadership and personal development of selected high school students in Iowa. Journal of Agricultural Education, (30), 30-34.
Camino, L. (2001) CO-SAMM: A tool to assess youth leadership. CYD (Community Youth Development) Journal, 3(1).
Dormody, T. J., & Seevers, B. S. (1994). Predicting youth leadership life skills development among FFA members in Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico.
Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(2), 65-71.
Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development (2001). Building community. Takoma Park, MD: Author.
Irby, M., et al. (2001). Youth action: Youth contributing to communities, communities supporting youth. Community and Youth Development Series, Vol.
6. Takoma Park, MD: The Forum for Youth Investment, International Youth Foundation.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kurth-Schai, R. (1994). Young people as resources: The challenge of transforming dreams into reality. New Designs for Youth Development. Fall.
Lofquist, W. (1989). The technology of prevention. Tucson, AZ: Associates for Youth Development.
National FFA Organization (2005). Online: http://www.ffa.org/about_ffa/index.html. Retrieved on November 18, 2005.
Peiter, R. L., Nall, M. A., & Rennekamp, R. (2005). FFA leadership: Do activities navigate toward full potential? Association of Leadership Educators: Published proceedings at: http://www.leadershipeducators.org/2005/peiter.pdf.
Rennekamp, R., & Nall, M. (2003). Using focus groups in program development and evaluation. Lexington, KY: Cooperative Extension Service.
Scales, P., & Leffert, N. (1999). Developmental assets: A synthesis of scientific research on adolescent development. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
Townsend, C. D., & Carter, R. I. (1983). The relationship of participation in FFA activities and leadership, citizenship, and cooperation. The Journal of the American Association of Teachers Educators in Agriculture, 24(1), 20-25.
Understanding youth development: Promoting positive pathways of Growth. (1997). CSR, Inc. Contracted by Family and Youth Services Bureau, Administration on Children Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Wingenbach, G. J., & Kahler, A. A. (1997). Self-perceived youth leadership and life skills of Iowa FFA members. Journal of Agricultural Education, 38(3), 18-27.
Zeldin, S., McDaniel, A., Topitzes, D., & Calvert, M. (2000). Youth in decision- making: A study on the impacts of youth on adults and organizations. Chevy Chase, MD: Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development, a Division of National 4-H Council.
Robin Peiter Horstmeier is an assistant professor of Agricultural Education in the Department of Community and Leadership Development at the University of Kentucky. Her areas of research include youth leadership development and mentoring new educators. In addition, her responsibilities include teaching undergraduate and graduate teacher education courses, and providing leadership to the Agricultural Education program.
Martha A. Nall is an Extension Professor with an academic appointment in the Department of Community and Leadership Development at the University of Kentucky. Her professional responsibilities include Program and Staff Development for the KY Cooperative Extension Service, including leadership education, coordinating the Extension Mentor Program, orientation and
training for County Agents and State Specialists, and teaching an undergraduate class.